July 01, 2011

Millenials and the social (net)workplace

By Elizabeth Burrell, Melcrum intern.

Social Media. It provides the main means of communication for many and in knowing this, one would think that employees would take advantage of this innovative form of contact. Unfortunately, recent research has shown that employers still see social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter and Youtube as persistent distractions. Fourty-eight percent of UK businesses are enforcing a ban on such websites, according to the joint survey conducted by PR firm Lewis Communications and IT firm HCL Technologies.

I wonder If such deprivation may cause an office to play residence to some unhappy workers. Furrowed brows, cracking knuckles and tapping brogues will be in full supply as the withdrawal symptoms begin to kick in.

Being a member of Generation Y, I can feel the frustration of my fellow millenials in this state. Such a situation mirrors that of a young child who’s pacifier is taken away. Having been accustomed to the calming sensation that comes with sucking on a dummy, a child will express their feelings of displeasure in the only way they can when such a valuable instrument is taken away.

Although 18 to 24 year-old workers cannot scream at their desks and restlessly pound at keyboards, it's important to note that in a study done by IT services firm Telindus, 39 percent of working millenials “would consider leaving” if social networks were banned in the workplace and a further 21 percent would feel “annoyed” by such a ban. If employees do find it “annoying” when social networking sites are banned then their emotions are sure to affect their productivity which can decrease the quality of service in a company. Surely it's better to have happier workers?

Although I understand that the availability of facebook in the workplace could lead to a lack of productivity among employees, by simply banning the sites employers will only limit potential collaborations within the company. Employers should reach an agreement with employees that although social networking sites may be used, employees are still expected to meet deadlines and targets.

A scheme of trust ought to be built within an organisation so that both the employer and employee are comfortable with their social media guidelines and limitations to fully maximise the potential of the business.

Does social media belong in the workplace? I'd love to know your thoughts.

July 12, 2010

Money doesn't equal motivation

By Nishwa Ashraf, Editorial Assistant, MelcrumNishwablog

What are the most effective ways to convince employees to work harder?

According to Dan Pink, author of “The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us,” monetary rewards isn’t one of them.

I came across this, visually delightful, 11-minute lecture, posted on the Decision Wise Leadership Intelligence Blog, where Pink makes the case for this seemingly counter-intuitive argument, which uses the RSA Animate format to illustrate his point.

While jobs that require straightforward, algorithmic tasks respond well to the carrot and stick, the same method fails with those requiring cognitive skills. Autonomy and purpose are actually much better motivators, he says.

Do you agree? Are financial rewards to the detriment of engagement?


June 28, 2010

Quad aims for slice of collaboration software market

By James Bennett, Head of Content, Melcrum James Bennett

Bringing social networking into the enterprise, as technology suppliers so often like to call it, has long been the Holy Grail of companies such as Microsoft, particularly with its widely used SharePoint collaboration platform.

In the last five years SharePoint has become the de facto software platform of choice. In the case of internal communications, however, this hasn’t always been a question of choice. As many of you will know, and some of you may have experienced first hand, SharePoint has often been foisted upon the function by those pesky geeks in IT . The geeks have either come to some sort of partnership agreement with Microsoft or simply gone behind everyone's backs, signed on the dotted line and gone with the only brand they know. Funnily enough, the general feedback I get from the large majority communicators is how difficult SharePoint is to deploy, use and customise.

Help or rather choice, however, appears to be on the horizon with Google’s collaboration and communications tool, Wave, now being slowly taken up by a small number of companies. But another player has recently joined the game. The latest vendor to attempt to capitalise on the desire of many organizations for secure, internal, corporate social networking, or “enterprise collaboration”, is Cisco with its new platform Quad.

One analyst called Cisco’s approach to bringing social networking into the enterprise “interesting and different” and "more than just having an internal Facebook-like mechanism”.

Cisco’s aim is to integrate enterprise applications into the internal communications mix, effectively melding various tools into one platform to give social networking more business functionality. There are already plenty of platforms that do this but it has some interesting features, while commentators online suggest it is very simple to use.

For example, Quad is designed to let users microblog within the platform, with posts going out to colleagues who follow them, while in-house microblogs can also be posted on Twitter effectively crossing the dreaded internal/external divide – something that may scare some communicators off. But there's no need to panic. For those of you who have recurring nightmares of employees posting updates about certain topics outside the firewall, Quad also enables you to set rules that limit users’ ability to post externally on certain topics or even on certain days.

Quad also includes a calendar application, along with voicemail integration, a “Facebook-like” feed of updates from colleagues that users have "befriended", work group communities, and a place where documents can be stored and made available for collaborative purposes. The platform also includes live video, recorded video storage, instant messaging and e-mail.

The home screen for Quad is the first thing employees see when they start work in the morning, the place they go to find out what’s happening in their company as well as their business tasks for the day, month or year. The top of the screen might show a companywide video message from the CEO, for example, while the side columns might highlight the status of the employee's key contacts and links to their communities within the organization, and a lower part of the screen might be taken up by an interface to the major applications they use.

With many companies being forced to do more with less and, at the same time, increase productivity and profits, implementing an enterprise social networking platform is becoming increasingly popular and has already proven a success in several organisations. Employees now not only demand rich (social media) communication in their own personal lives but equally in their everyday working lives and careers. Harnessing this demand to improve organizational productivity is a logical step.

For some great examples, advice, information, research and best practice case studies, register your interest for Melcrum’s social media report 2010 available soon.

June 09, 2010

Happy 40th IABC! 40 things I learned at World Congress 2010

By James Bennett, Head of Content, Melcrum James Bennett

  1. The breakdown of trust in leaders is at its lowest ever point and will deteriorate further. But now’s the time to swap dancing partners. Research has shown that middle and line managers are the most trusted people within organizations and it up to us to get on their side and work with them as effectively as possible to leverage that trust.
  2. Social media was discussed in almost every conversation and session I had and attended. But talking simply isn’t enough. The feeling from the profession is that communicators are using the tools, but they don’t seem to be using them to reach a constructive end goal and with the overall company strategy in mind.
  3. Employee volunteering works. Fact. It improves communication, morale and motivation, personal fulfillment and those companies that actively engage in volunteering are more profitable, experience reduced absenteeism and are winning the war for talent. Two-thirds of Gen Y employees at Deloitte, for example, said they would rather work for a company that encourages volunteering.
  4. In the post-recession age we live and work in, always plan for the unthinkable.
  5. Communication is a company’s most powerful ally in a crisis… just ask BP.
  6. Empower your employees by allowing them to become product ambassadors. Let them get their hands dirty.
  7. Accept the risks of allowing employees to express themselves freely and instead focus on the end goal and the rewards.
  8. Have courage part one – don’t be afraid to get fired.
  9. Have courage part two – don’t be afraid to tell the CEO he’s a terrible presenter and he “lip smacks” when on video.
  10. Leaders are like tofu: clearly part of the meal, perhaps even the main source of nutrition, but the spice is provided by everyone around them.
  11. Make it a habit – make engagement part of employees' everyday routines for it to pay dividends.
  12. Follow the example of the Me to We philosophy and movement and create a culture of empathy, community, meaning and legacy.
  13. Memorise and use this quote: “We can do no great things; only small things with great love.”
    Mother Theresa
  14. Content in context is king and data is his queen.
  15. Successful leaders should always lead with their ace and play the communication card.
  16. Every leader has his blind spot – and it’s up to you to spot them.
  17. All communicators are sales people.
  18. Information is useless – your audience wants knowledge.
  19. Get stuck in traffic – find opportunities to do nothing and when you do, do nothing but think.
  20. Read your writing aloud – strive to thrill yourself with what you write.
  21. Writing is like a window – it should allow your readers to see what would otherwise be invisible.
  22. Make your writing transparent – help your readers see your ideas, not your words.
  23. Outsource the gaps in your skill set.
  24. Communication can release the best potent asset, the human asset.
  25. Communication is the path to survival, recovery and growth and a company’s constant companion.
  26. Communication is a leader’s lifeline to results.
  27. Communicate the future – write a fake news article showing your employees what the future looks like and how you can all work together to achieve greatness.
  28. Only 19% of global employees are looking to leave their current roles, but the engagement gap is widening – Towers Watson 2010 Workforce Study.
  29. Employees don’t know where to turn in 2010. In a global study when Towers Watson asked people whether they would like a job for life with one company, follow their opportunities as they come along or only work for two or three employers during their careers, the data was split exactly three ways.
  30. Employees are reliant on their managers and leaders but not confident in what they are doing for them.
  31. Embrace uncertainty.
  32. The recession has ended the “deal” between employer and employee.
  33. The “new deal” is about knowing and enabling your workforce, customising their experience and planning for the future.
  34. The “new deal” will take courage, innovation and discipline – leaders will play a vital role.
  35. The Art of Innovation – Polarize people over issues they care about.
  36. Never stop learning and continuously seek knowledge.
  37. Act like an agency – make your "clients", a.k.a your employees, the stars.
  38. Always seek to add value.
  39. As a conference organizer always provide a reliable Wi-Fi connection… although IABC never fear, even Steve Jobs had issues at the launch of the iPhone 4.
  40. Canadians say “eh”. Rather a lot.

May 28, 2010

Time we got back to basics?

NishwablogBy Nishwa Ashraf, Editorial Assistant, Melcrum

Facebook, instant messenger, intranets, mobile alerts, Twitter, MySpace and FaceSpace - these are just some of the channels businesses are using to reach employees. Okay, the last one  doesn’t exist.

With such a wide array of technology at our fingertips, you’d think communicating with employees and delivering key messages couldn’t be easier. But is it any surprise it can actually make things more complicated?

Don’t get me wrong, technology has many fantastic benefits: For disparate colleagues web meetings can bridge the geographical gap, internal microblog applications such as Yammer are useful for announcing low priority messages and keeping colleagues informed on day-to-day work-related issues, training videos and campaigns can reach a global workforce through the intranet, and let’s not forget that for Gen Y entering the workforce technology is second nature. 

But let’s be honest, is it really improving communications in your company or are you just jumping onto the latest bandwagon? 

You may be a social media maestro, but how skilled are you at delivering face-to face messages to frontline employees, without the safety of your computer screen shielding you?  In the same vein, you may be a seasoned face-to-face communicator but are you savvy enough to deal with the technology demands of a new generation of employees?

To be an effective communicator, lies in the title itself. Finding the right way to communicate is the most important thing, whether it’s through social media channels or town hall meetings, because you can roll out a marching band to drum through your message, but if it doesn’t produce results, then it doesn’t mean a thing. 

In some instances, using the best channels to achieve your aim and to suit the message does not always require a song and dance. For example, if your company wants to reduce waste by encouraging employees to switch off power points before they leave the office, then a roadshow is not required. Why not take a leaf out of Aggregate Industries “Green Dot project” and apply a green sticker on light switches as a reminder. Simple, cheap, and more importantly, more effective.

If any of this sounds familiar, then perhaps it’s time to equip yourself with the skills and core competencies needed to produce and deliver exceptional communications. With more than 1,000 graduates in its alumni, the Black Belt Programme builds on extensive research to equip communicators with the key skills and knowledge they need to excel in their roles and impact organizational performance. 

So, are you a technophobe or tech-junkie? And do you need to be a master of one or a jack of all trades to survive and succeed in today's cut throat business world? Let me know your thoughts.

April 01, 2010

One and a half staff needed to look after social media channels

By James Bennett, Head of Content, Melcrum James Bennett

“Spend less money on social media tools within an organization and there is less reason to prove ROI”, said Richard Dennison, senior manager, social media at telecoms company BT, during a webinar yesterday afternoon. According to Dennison and many other practitioners there is little evidence of social media initiatives within organizations proving a return on investment. But surely they should, particularly if recent research on the amount of time it takes to maintain social media channels is true.

A study by CloudSpark, a US communications strategy company, has discovered that it takes a minimum of 65 hours a week to maintain four social media channels for one brand. Many social media channels maybe considered “free”, but if this is accurate (and not an April Fool), the time you need to create, develop, and maintain those channels is far from free and would take 1.5 full time staff to complete.

CloudSpark surveyed 40 “social media practitioners” from the external and internal spheres, and questioned them on the hours they invest in social media for their brands or the brands of their clients. In the survey it defined the following: creation – setting up the page with initial content (this doesn’t include creative design team hours); development – attracting followers, initial promotion/launch; and maintenance – listening, responding, posting, messaging, inviting.

I’d love to know just how long it takes internal communicators to maintain their social media channels. Please leave a comment on the blog or drop me an email at james.bennett@melcrum.com.

Here are a few stats from the surveyed practitioners and the time they spend on social media for a single brand:

Planning
Social Media Research: Eight to 25 hours
Social Media Planning: 10 to 20 hours

Blog
Creation: 10-15 hours
Development: 40 hours
Maintenance: Five hours/week

LinkedIn
Creation: One hour
Development: Five to 15 hours
Maintenance: Three to 10 hours/week

Facebook (Fan or Group Page)
Creation: Three to 12 hours
Development: 10 to 50 hours
Maintenance: Seven to 15 hours/week

Twitter
Creation: One hour
Development: 15-40 hours
Maintenance: Three to seven hours/week

YouTube (branded channel)
Creation: Three hours
Development: Five to 20 hours
Maintenance: Two to seven hours/week

September 09, 2009

End of the huddle: Are we in danger of losing face-to-face comms?

By James Bennett, Managing Online Editor, Melcrum James Bennett

Every morning at 10am without fail, the group heads at Melcrum will have a huddle. And considering many people here either run, cycle or commute to work on the London underground and that medical experts are warning of a widespread outbreak of swine flu as the winter months draw in, this may all sound rather unhygienic, but unless you’ve tried it, that’s where you’d be wrong. When better to set the tone for the working day than first thing in the morning, a time when everyone’s fresh (minded) and raring to go.

The first rule of the huddle is to, well, huddle. In simple terms this entails gathering in a small circle with one member of the team leading the way. Whether he or she is called the ‘huddler’ is neither here nor there, call them whatever you like, but above all the leader must always maintain control and ensure brevity. The huddle must not last more than 10 minutes. That would be more muddle than huddle.

It is also key to remember that a huddle is not a discussion but a series of statements mentioned and listened to attentively by the key members of the company, something many CEOs could perhaps adopt in order to have a better understanding of what their line managers do on a daily basis. If they had embraced this form of communication it may well have saved the jobs, careers and foundations of many of the world’s workers, executives and iconic businesses that have now crumpled into a sorry, recessionary heap.

Putting the recession to one side, the huddle leader then goes round each member of the group asking each individual what he or she is working on that day. The group leader may then ask for a short daily sales report or any outstanding achievements, events, or queries to be announced but this is also done strictly in turn and in the same order. This is finally followed by the leader then questioning each huddle member on whether or not they are facing any potential ‘blocks’, or problems that could prevent them from carrying out their daily duties. Anything else is then taken offline and worked on separately.

Social networking

The explosion of social networking and platforms such as Yammer, however, got me thinking about whether or not we need huddles any more? Having access to the internet, 3G mobile phones, endless iPhone applications, email, Twitter, instant messaging, texting, voicemail, video on demand, and even the now prehistoric but still essential conference call allows us to communicate whenever we want, from wherever we want and with whoever we want. Not only that, we can use whatever method we choose because the majority of professionals have access to all this technology for virtually no cost whatsoever.

But unlike the blinkered 1990s vision of a paperless office (he says printing this off), essentially doing business and communicating with someone without ever meeting them during your working career could eventually happen. Just ask yourself how many times someone has said to you, “it’s great to finally meet you after all those emails”, or “I never realised you looked like that in real life?” Real life? People have forgotten what it’s like to meet and simply don’t have as much face time as they used to. And, year after year, this trend is increasing.

On the flipside, however this can have its advantages. Take Yammer for instance, a closed corporate network that allows you to connect with all your colleagues via a website, pop-up desktop application and/or mobile phone app and to continually share with your colleagues what work or even social activities you are doing that day, week or month. You could be in IT fixing the server that runs the entire operation, or in sales and in need of volunteers for a cross-country charity cycle ride or perhaps in HR carrying out a series of interviews for a key senior of the team who has just left. The point is that everyone in your network has real-time access to the events and actions of their colleagues day in, day out. At Melcrum we’re using it as an experiment and the amount of knowledge sharing, ideas and information you learn about the business and each other is invaluable. Using a tool like Yammer allows you to communicate to your colleagues simply, cost-free and with messages targeted specifically to them and their network. I’ll be sharing this blog link with my colleagues the instant it goes online.

Yammer serves the same purpose as a huddle but in this case is arguably more transparent and messaging is not restricted to a small number of senior leaders. However, face-to-face contact and that instant sharing of crucial first thing in the morning, targeted information is immediately lost. Many communicators have faced or are facing huge budget cuts and being told that face-to-face communication is the most effective form of comms during a recession, but is it really? Surely in this tech-savvy day and age real-time online conversations then lead to an increase in information sharing and eventually personal contact? I’d be very keen to see any research on how effective online conversations are compared to face-to-face meetings.

There is, however, no instant solution. Each company has its own culture, needs, and Web 2.0 experience levels. The common answer to a successful internal communications strategy is to use a combination of communication channels. Many companies now use a blend of blogs, conference calls, live question and answer video streaming with the executive board as well as face-to-face meetings, but despite this leap forwards one still has to question, how effective this all is, where this is all heading and how we will be communicating within our organizations in the future.

Now that I’ve blogged and not physically spoken to any of you before I’d better get on with the rest of my day.

Please email me with any thoughts to: james.bennett@melcrum.com, find me on Twitter or log onto Melcrum's Twitter feed.

June 24, 2009

Top video interview tips from Melcrum's Social Media workshop

By Sona Hathi, Assistant Editor, Melcrum Sona Hathi

Earlier, I managed to sneak into Melcrum's Social Media workshop, taking place as I blog, in our London office. I timed my entrance well as the group of about 25 communication professionals were just about to hear expert advice on creating video for use inside companies.

Former TV producer and private investigator Debbie Davies shared the following top tips for producing top quality video:

  1. Take your time.
  2. Give the interviewee an overview of what you're going to ask.
  3. Be encouraging.
  4. Know your equipment.
  5. Tell them where the video will be published.
  6. Think about the different ways to do an interview. Will the subject look straight into the camera or at an angle? Do you want questions to be heard or do you want the interviewee to build the question in their answer?
  7. Remember to leave gaps in between questions and answers - you'll need them when editing later.
  8. Think about lighting, background scenery and noise - even things like air conditioning can be disturbing. Put up a do not disturb sign if necessary.
  9. Avoid fancy shots - zooming in and out can be distracting and also waste battery power.
  10. Remember to get permission! Look on the internet for downloadable contracts of agreement. As a last minute option, get the interviewee to say on camera "My name is xxx and I am being interviewed by xxx about xxx and am aware that this will be broadcast on xxx," and then keep this as a record.

We're experimenting with video ourselves here at Melcrum and have become big fans of the Flip camera. It's very easy to use, great quality and it fits in your pocket. It's perfect for getting employees to do video diaries like Pfizer did, or informal interviews that are easy to publish on You Tube, like we did in this quick interview below, with Abi Signorelli, Director of Internal Communication at Virgin Media - who was also one of the trainers at the social media workshop today.

June 12, 2009

Social Media Workshop buzz hots up

By James Bennett, Managing Online Editor, Melcrum James Bennett

The one-day Melcrum Social Media Workshop on June 24th is getting closer and closer. Not, admittedly as close as my face has been to several dozen commuters' armpits on a number of London’s buses in the last 48 hours thanks to the Underground strike, but very close nevertheless. 14 days to be precise. And we’ve got a great day for those clamouring to join us here in Hammersmith at Melcrum’s training centre.

In fact our trainer for the day Benjamin Ellis, director of Redcatco and social media expert extraordinaire, and Abi Signorelli, director of internal communications at Virgin Media, got together this morning to finalise the agenda for the event. Not only that, they also produced an AudioBoo - a 3 minute recording via a special application on the Apple iPhone. Abi also joined myself and Melcrum founders Victoria Mellor and Robin Crumby on Wednesday afternoon Boo’d us, so to speak and then I turned the camera back onto Abi to ask her what delegates can expect from the day and how she has used social media to great effect at Virgin Media. She’s the kind of person that if she hasn’t downloaded the latest ‘app’ onto her iPhone within 30 minutes of being developed and added to Apple’s gigantic library of applications she gets upset. You can’t blame her, social media is fascinating and I’m as caught up the excitement as her and many other internal communicators.

So what can you expect on June 24?

  • The day is designed to be a very practical and hands-on series of interactive sessions complete with a number of exercises specifically created for internal communicators.
  • It will set the context and go from where you, as communicators using social media, are today to using the technology, and gaining the necessary skills and knowledge for you to take it back to your teams and improve communications within your business.
  • It will examine the great places in which to use social media and the areas where you shouldn’t using real-life examples and case studies, including the huge successes Virgin Media’s internal communications team has had using a variety of technologies and social media platforms.
  • It will dispel the myths and fears that some internal communicators may have about social media and show you how, with the right tools, knowledge, skills, business culture and technology, it can open up a whole host of new opportunities to communicate with your stakeholders.
  • It will show you how the technology behind social media is among the most user-friendly and interactive we, as professionals and internal communicators, have ever seen and used allowing you to tap into possibilities you never knew existed.

I hope you can join us in 14 days. I look forward to seeing you then. Meanwhile, please follow me on Twitter via iether @Geskey or @Melcrum.

May 28, 2009

US execs struggle to balance social media usage

By James Bennett, Managing Online Editor, Melcrum James Bennett

The speed and immediacy in which social media can target and reach an audience is unprecedented and something corporations have never had to deal with. Until now. Companies and individuals can talk to one another faster and with more impact than has ever been witnessed. We can complain, praise, raise controversial issues, create instant debate, mull over life’s trivialities and share any and every piece of information we like with whomever we like wherever and whenever we like.

We are lucky. Or so you’d think. On the flipside and as accounting firm Deloitte’s latest ethics and workplace survey of 2,000 US employed adults shows, the decision to post videos, pictures, thoughts, experiences and observations to social networking sites can have far reaching ethical consequences for individuals and organizations. Therefore, as Sharon L Allen, chairman of the board at Deloitte says in her introduction, it is important for executives to “be mindful of the implications and to elevate the discussion about the risks to the highest levels of leadership”.

For example, 74% of employed Americans believe it is easy to damage a brand’s reputation via sites such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Just think back to the now infamous YouTube video of Dominos Pizza, where a number of employees were doing rather vile things to the company’s products. Millions of people saw that clip irreparably damaging the company’s brand forever.

Brand risk – the executive view

Surprisingly, the firm found that only 15% of executives were addressing the threat of online organisational risk in the board room, while a larger 58%, the majority of them perhaps not having acted upon these risks, agreeing it was important to address these issues and take them more seriously. Reassuringly, but equally low, a mere 17% were found to have programs in place to monitor and mitigate the potential risks related to the use of social networks.

Employee privacy – the executive view

The increase in the use of social networks in the home and the workplace has meant that the line between public and private lives has become more blurred than ever before. Adding your superior to your ‘friends’ list on Facebook or ‘following’ him or her on Twitter has led to a number of firings and unfortunate incidents so it was interesting to see that this study found that a whopping 60% of executives said they “had the right to know” how employees portray themselves and their organizations online, while 53% of employees believe that social networking pages are “none of the employers’ business”. Rather shockingly, it seems that employees using social networking sites do not give any thought to what their employer’s reputation or the risks they might be putting their company under by talking about them online. Nearly a third of employed respondents said they never consider what the boss would think before posting material online.

So what should a leader and his internal comms team do to mitigate online reputational risk? Well, establish clear policies, protocols and company guidelines may not be enough as nearly half of the US respondents said that clearly defined guidelines would not change how they behave in cyberspace. The key, according to Deloitte, is implementing an emphasis on culture, values and ethics within your organization. But to conclude, not every executive or employer is out to get their staff; the survey found that 56% of executives said that using social networking sites helps their employees achieve better work-life balance. Now isn’t that sweet?

Key findings:

Employees:

  • 74% of employees say it’s easy to damage a company’s reputation while using social media.
  • 53% said their social networking pages were none of their employers’ business.
  • 61% said that even if employers were monitoring their online activities or profiles, they would not change what they were doing.
  • 49% said a company policy on how they behave online would not alter their behaviour.
  • 24% said they didn’t know whether or not their company had a policy about the uses of social networking channels.
  • 15% said that if their employer did something that they didn’t agree with they would comment about it online.
  • 27% don’t consider the ethical consequences of posting comments, photos or videos online.
  • 31% of employees said that using social networking sites helps them achieve better work-life balance.
  • 22% visit networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace, Twitter and YouTube five or more times a week, while only 6% access them during work hours.
  • 7% said that in the past six months at least one of their colleagues was made redundant because of inappropriate behavior online.

Employers:

  • 58% of executives agree that reputational risk should be a boardroom issue, but only 15% say it actually is.
  • 40% said that employees’ social networking pages were their business, while 30% admit to monitoring social networking sites.
  • 56% of executives said that using social networking sites helps their employees achieve better work-life balance.
  • 31% of CEO’s are on Facebook, 14% have a Twitter profile, while 18% have an employee created Facebook group.
  • 23% use social networking as part of their internal communications strategy, while 21% use it to engage their employees.
Sign up for your FREE 7Day Melcrum Membership

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Recent Comments