|    Home     |     About     |    Melcrum.com    |    Melcrum Store    |    Internal Comms Hub    |    Research Forum    |       |

October 20, 2009

SCM summit London 2009: The 10 communication commandments

By James Bennett, Managing Online Editor, Melcrum James Bennett

Vivienne Huybrecht, general manager group communication at KBC Group gave a fascinating insight into her tumultuous year at one of Belgium’s largest financial institutions at this morning's 8th annual Melcrum Strategic Communication Management Summit at London’s Tower Hotel.

Vivienne wasn’t just in charge of internal communications, when the financial crisis hit KBC faster and harder than anyone could ever have predicted she was also charged with looking after every aspect of external communications and media relations – a huge task for anyone but somehow she managed it and survived. Mainly, she told me, because of her sporty nature and her motto of never giving up. Look out for a quick video interview in the next few days.

At the height of the storm she was receiving more than 100 phone calls from journalists day and night, saw KBC’s share price plummet and to top it all off her chief executive had a heart attack in May and had to stand down. It was sobering stuff and one of the best internal communication stories I have ever heard.

One of the best elements of the presentation was her 10 communication commandments during a crisis. Here they are:

  1. Visible leadership – staff should be able to see the whites of their eyes
  2. Be honest and open at all times
  3. Tell it like it is
  4. Be confident!
  5. New CEO mantra – overperform and under promise
  6. Be clear and keep it simple
  7. Move fast and decisively
  8. Make no promises about the future unless you can achieve them with absolute certainty
  9. Use face-to-face communications as much as possible
  10. Never give up

September 09, 2009

End of the huddle: Are we in danger of losing face-to-face comms?

By James Bennett, Managing Online Editor, Melcrum James Bennett

Every morning at 10am without fail, the group heads at Melcrum will have a huddle. And considering many people here either run, cycle or commute to work on the London underground and that medical experts are warning of a widespread outbreak of swine flu as the winter months draw in, this may all sound rather unhygienic, but unless you’ve tried it, that’s where you’d be wrong. When better to set the tone for the working day than first thing in the morning, a time when everyone’s fresh (minded) and raring to go.

The first rule of the huddle is to, well, huddle. In simple terms this entails gathering in a small circle with one member of the team leading the way. Whether he or she is called the ‘huddler’ is neither here nor there, call them whatever you like, but above all the leader must always maintain control and ensure brevity. The huddle must not last more than 10 minutes. That would be more muddle than huddle.

It is also key to remember that a huddle is not a discussion but a series of statements mentioned and listened to attentively by the key members of the company, something many CEOs could perhaps adopt in order to have a better understanding of what their line managers do on a daily basis. If they had embraced this form of communication it may well have saved the jobs, careers and foundations of many of the world’s workers, executives and iconic businesses that have now crumpled into a sorry, recessionary heap.

Putting the recession to one side, the huddle leader then goes round each member of the group asking each individual what he or she is working on that day. The group leader may then ask for a short daily sales report or any outstanding achievements, events, or queries to be announced but this is also done strictly in turn and in the same order. This is finally followed by the leader then questioning each huddle member on whether or not they are facing any potential ‘blocks’, or problems that could prevent them from carrying out their daily duties. Anything else is then taken offline and worked on separately.

Social networking

The explosion of social networking and platforms such as Yammer, however, got me thinking about whether or not we need huddles any more? Having access to the internet, 3G mobile phones, endless iPhone applications, email, Twitter, instant messaging, texting, voicemail, video on demand, and even the now prehistoric but still essential conference call allows us to communicate whenever we want, from wherever we want and with whoever we want. Not only that, we can use whatever method we choose because the majority of professionals have access to all this technology for virtually no cost whatsoever.

But unlike the blinkered 1990s vision of a paperless office (he says printing this off), essentially doing business and communicating with someone without ever meeting them during your working career could eventually happen. Just ask yourself how many times someone has said to you, “it’s great to finally meet you after all those emails”, or “I never realised you looked like that in real life?” Real life? People have forgotten what it’s like to meet and simply don’t have as much face time as they used to. And, year after year, this trend is increasing.

On the flipside, however this can have its advantages. Take Yammer for instance, a closed corporate network that allows you to connect with all your colleagues via a website, pop-up desktop application and/or mobile phone app and to continually share with your colleagues what work or even social activities you are doing that day, week or month. You could be in IT fixing the server that runs the entire operation, or in sales and in need of volunteers for a cross-country charity cycle ride or perhaps in HR carrying out a series of interviews for a key senior of the team who has just left. The point is that everyone in your network has real-time access to the events and actions of their colleagues day in, day out. At Melcrum we’re using it as an experiment and the amount of knowledge sharing, ideas and information you learn about the business and each other is invaluable. Using a tool like Yammer allows you to communicate to your colleagues simply, cost-free and with messages targeted specifically to them and their network. I’ll be sharing this blog link with my colleagues the instant it goes online.

Yammer serves the same purpose as a huddle but in this case is arguably more transparent and messaging is not restricted to a small number of senior leaders. However, face-to-face contact and that instant sharing of crucial first thing in the morning, targeted information is immediately lost. Many communicators have faced or are facing huge budget cuts and being told that face-to-face communication is the most effective form of comms during a recession, but is it really? Surely in this tech-savvy day and age real-time online conversations then lead to an increase in information sharing and eventually personal contact? I’d be very keen to see any research on how effective online conversations are compared to face-to-face meetings.

There is, however, no instant solution. Each company has its own culture, needs, and Web 2.0 experience levels. The common answer to a successful internal communications strategy is to use a combination of communication channels. Many companies now use a blend of blogs, conference calls, live question and answer video streaming with the executive board as well as face-to-face meetings, but despite this leap forwards one still has to question, how effective this all is, where this is all heading and how we will be communicating within our organizations in the future.

Now that I’ve blogged and not physically spoken to any of you before I’d better get on with the rest of my day.

Please email me with any thoughts to: james.bennett@melcrum.com, find me on Twitter or log onto Melcrum's Twitter feed.

September 04, 2009

Diary of an internal communicator - Week 4

By Rachel Allen, Head of Communication, London Overground Rail Operations (LOROL) Rachel Allen

Rachel Allen has just started in her new role as the first head of communications at London Overground Rail Operations Ltd (LOROL) a company launched in November 2007 and train service that links 20 of London’s 33 boroughs. Rachel is the first communications professional ever to be hired by LOROL. Previous to her joining the company did not have a communication plan.

Read her article on creating an internal communications strategy from scratch on the Internal Comms Hub.

Over the last four weeks Rachel written an exclusive diary for Melcrum revealing first hand what it’s like to create and implement an internal communication plan and strategy from scratch, the people and challenges she’s faced along the way and the highs and lows she’s come across on her exciting new journey. It's made for fascinating reading for any professional communicator out there.

Here is her fourth and final entry:

Tuesday 1 September

How did it get to be September already? I can’t believe I am now into my fourth week at LOROL. Today I wrote a guide on delivering effective team briefings and how to encourage people to take part in discussions. I finalised the content of the team briefing for this period and issued it along with the guide and a revised feedback form.

A few employees have already contacted me to say they think it is a ‘vast improvement’ and they think it should be easier to brief. I’m really pleased with their comments as I created the new format using their feedback from the past few weeks. I’ve been invited to go along to various meetings to see how people deliver it to their teams, so I’m putting dates in the diary to do that. The first one will be at Willesden depot on Monday which should be interesting. I’ve been promised a ‘proper tour’ of the facility there  so I'm looking forward to that.

Wednesday 2 September

My desk is full of logos today! I’ve got the proofs of all the colour variations to look through to decide which ones to use and where they should go and what the rules are. I’m really happy with the work that’s been done so far. I also met with another designer today who’s been doing some work for us, it was good to meet face-to-face and talk through our ideas together. I met up with a friend of mine last night for dinner and we ended up discussing social media and its impact on internal communications. I found myself looking up the dissertation I wrote earlier in the year to refresh my memory on some of the theory I had read. There are so many things I would like to implement here. I need to be patient and take it one step at a time!

Thursday 3 September


We had an HR team meeting yesterday afternoon and discussed our objectives. I'm starting to think about introducing long service awards and a recognition scheme. Many employees have worked on the railways for years and have a real pride in their work. I think it's important the company has a scheme in place that not only celebrates worthwhile contributions but also honours these long-serving employees. I'm researching other organisations at the moment to see what works well to help me decide what will be appropriate for us, based on information I've picked up over the past month and input from people in the organisation. I think it's important to get this initiative up and running as soon as possible so will be tying it into my overall communications strategy through consistent messaging. I'm planning to do this by sharpening up our values and aligning the recognition scheme to them. I think this is important and I hope it will engage employees because I will ask for their input to help me decide how best to recognise them.

Friday 4 September

So here it is - my final diary entry. I've found the past month has flown by and has been fascinating. I've been made to feel so welcome here, I've met some really interesting people and have also received lots of emails from readers of this blog offering me their advice, support and encouragement.

The past four weeks have seen me undertake a huge learning curve, with lots to take in - which is to be expected when you start any new role. While my diary ends here, the hard work certainly doesn't and I now have lots of ideas of how I would like communication to be at LOROL based on what I've discovered. I'll be intrigued to look back at this diary in a few months' time to see where I'm at and how many of my plans I've already managed to implement. More than anything I've come to realise the importance of having a good network of communications professionals. Knowing that there are people I am in touch with in the industry that I can bounce ideas off and brainstorm with is invaluable.

I'm looking forward to going to Melcrum's Strategic Communication Management summit in London next month to hear from the experts there, increase my knowledge further and add some new people to my network. Hopefully I'll get to meet many of you there!

Rachel

August 21, 2009

Diary of an internal communicator – Week 2

By Rachel Allen, Head of Communication, London Overground Rail Operations (LOROL) Rachel Allen

Rachel Allen has just started in her new role as the first head of communications at London Overground Rail Operations Ltd (LOROL) a company launched in November 2007 and train service that links 20 of London’s 33 boroughs. Rachel is the first communications professional ever to be hired by LOROL. Previous to her joining the company did not have a communication plan. She will have to start from scratch.

Rachel will be writing an exclusive diary for Melcrum for the next three weeks revealing first hand what it’s like to create and implement an internal communication plan and strategy from scratch, the people and challenges she’ll face along the way and the highs and lows she’ll come across on her exciting new journey. It will make fascinating reading for any communicator out there.

Here is her second entry:

Monday 17 August

Today was mainly back-to-back meetings with members of the executive team and managers across the business. It’s interesting to hear what the different priorities are and it’s brilliant that everyone seems so interested in communication and wants to improve it. Last Friday’s network visit went well, I chatted to drivers in mess rooms and they told me where they get information (and rumours) from, their feelings about communication and what they would like to know more about. Targeting drivers and other frontline employees, such as conductors, to ensure they feel informed about LOROL is going to be key for me as they make up a large chunk of our employees. I went onto the platform at Willesden and one of the drivers proudly showed me one of the new fleet as it pulled in – a class 378 train that was unveiled by Mayor of London Boris Johnson recently at a press event. It was great to see the genuine pride our employees have around the new trains. There are lots of exciting things happening at LOROL over the next 18 months, including preparations and training underway for the East London Line opening and I want to make sure there are ways to share the success and create a buzz across the organisation.

Tuesday 18 August

This morning I started work to outline our communications strategy, pulling together various information including our aim, values, focus areas and business objectives. I’m trying to create a picture of the whole company to see what it has said in the past in terms of how it wants to be and what it is aiming for. I want to make sure anything I implement ties into those messages and statements. I’ve also got hold of the employee survey results and am going to get them re-analysed so I can break the company down into sections and identify any gaps. For example, could it be that conductors, the largest group of employees,  feel communication isn’t done well? If so, what am I going to recommend to target them? Knowing where the problem areas are will help me focus and create a plan of action. I've also signed off the latest issue of the employee magazine and that's on its way to the printers. I'm looking forward to making it more effective and work harder in the future. I think on the surface the idea of a magazine is good but there are lots of ways in which it could be improved, it's a great starting point though.

Wednesday 19 August

Crazy day. I was literally at my desk for about 30 minutes thanks to back-to-back meetings all day. My glossary list is growing and I’m feeling more confident that I can unravel the tangle of jargon in conversations. Speaking of my desk, it arrived today so I’m officially in one place now, although I don’t plan to be purely at the head office but get out and about as much as I can. I bought a plant for it too, so I'll try not to stay away from my desk too much in case I kill it! I report into the HR Director and today we had a direct reports meeting which was useful to understand what has been done in the past and to hear insights into the culture of our organization from the senior managers in HR. We are aiming to go for Investors in People (IiP) accreditation in the future. I recently underwent training to be an internal IiP assessor and am hoping the theory I learned at Tube Lines will help me work alongside the team at LOROL to ensure we are on the right track (no pun intended) for the assessment.

Thursday 20 August

Had a one-to-one with our MD Steve this morning and updated him on what I've been up to. Got him to sign off the new branding bits and bobs so am nearly ready to launch our new logo internally, just want to make sure I'm totally happy with the guidelines first. Our discussion led to social media and he's asked me to show him how Twitter works, which is great. I then met with some of the safety team and created them a comms plan for a safety culture survey they are rolling out. The external supplier who looks after our internet came in to meet me and we talked about the various options I have to update and refresh our website. Lots to think about. This afternoon I was out of the office at a comms flashmob event I helped organise a few months ago. This was a chance for comms professionals to get together both in person and virtually in order to help define how internal communications is presented on Wikipedia. I'm missing being surrounded by a comms team I can bounce ideas off so it was good to be alongside other comms professionals today.

Friday 21 August

Today I'm going to be mainly concentrating on the branding guidelines so they are ready to share with employees. I will also be adding more content to the comms strategy document I started on Tuesday, based on everything I've learned this week. Tomorrow the company has a family fun day organised that I'll be attending. This is the second year it has been held and I'm hoping to speak to as many people as possible while I'm there. I think the day is a great idea as it will be an opportunity for employees to get together and bring their families and for the executive team to be more visible.

Until next week,

Rachel

If you have any questions for Rachel please comment below or email me James Bennett, Melcrum's online managing editor. Come back next week to hear how her third week went as London Overground’s new head of communications.

May 28, 2009

US execs struggle to balance social media usage

By James Bennett, Managing Online Editor, Melcrum James Bennett

The speed and immediacy in which social media can target and reach an audience is unprecedented and something corporations have never had to deal with. Until now. Companies and individuals can talk to one another faster and with more impact than has ever been witnessed. We can complain, praise, raise controversial issues, create instant debate, mull over life’s trivialities and share any and every piece of information we like with whomever we like wherever and whenever we like.

We are lucky. Or so you’d think. On the flipside and as accounting firm Deloitte’s latest ethics and workplace survey of 2,000 US employed adults shows, the decision to post videos, pictures, thoughts, experiences and observations to social networking sites can have far reaching ethical consequences for individuals and organizations. Therefore, as Sharon L Allen, chairman of the board at Deloitte says in her introduction, it is important for executives to “be mindful of the implications and to elevate the discussion about the risks to the highest levels of leadership”.

For example, 74% of employed Americans believe it is easy to damage a brand’s reputation via sites such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Just think back to the now infamous YouTube video of Dominos Pizza, where a number of employees were doing rather vile things to the company’s products. Millions of people saw that clip irreparably damaging the company’s brand forever.

Brand risk – the executive view

Surprisingly, the firm found that only 15% of executives were addressing the threat of online organisational risk in the board room, while a larger 58%, the majority of them perhaps not having acted upon these risks, agreeing it was important to address these issues and take them more seriously. Reassuringly, but equally low, a mere 17% were found to have programs in place to monitor and mitigate the potential risks related to the use of social networks.

Employee privacy – the executive view

The increase in the use of social networks in the home and the workplace has meant that the line between public and private lives has become more blurred than ever before. Adding your superior to your ‘friends’ list on Facebook or ‘following’ him or her on Twitter has led to a number of firings and unfortunate incidents so it was interesting to see that this study found that a whopping 60% of executives said they “had the right to know” how employees portray themselves and their organizations online, while 53% of employees believe that social networking pages are “none of the employers’ business”. Rather shockingly, it seems that employees using social networking sites do not give any thought to what their employer’s reputation or the risks they might be putting their company under by talking about them online. Nearly a third of employed respondents said they never consider what the boss would think before posting material online.

So what should a leader and his internal comms team do to mitigate online reputational risk? Well, establish clear policies, protocols and company guidelines may not be enough as nearly half of the US respondents said that clearly defined guidelines would not change how they behave in cyberspace. The key, according to Deloitte, is implementing an emphasis on culture, values and ethics within your organization. But to conclude, not every executive or employer is out to get their staff; the survey found that 56% of executives said that using social networking sites helps their employees achieve better work-life balance. Now isn’t that sweet?

Key findings:

Employees:

  • 74% of employees say it’s easy to damage a company’s reputation while using social media.
  • 53% said their social networking pages were none of their employers’ business.
  • 61% said that even if employers were monitoring their online activities or profiles, they would not change what they were doing.
  • 49% said a company policy on how they behave online would not alter their behaviour.
  • 24% said they didn’t know whether or not their company had a policy about the uses of social networking channels.
  • 15% said that if their employer did something that they didn’t agree with they would comment about it online.
  • 27% don’t consider the ethical consequences of posting comments, photos or videos online.
  • 31% of employees said that using social networking sites helps them achieve better work-life balance.
  • 22% visit networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace, Twitter and YouTube five or more times a week, while only 6% access them during work hours.
  • 7% said that in the past six months at least one of their colleagues was made redundant because of inappropriate behavior online.

Employers:

  • 58% of executives agree that reputational risk should be a boardroom issue, but only 15% say it actually is.
  • 40% said that employees’ social networking pages were their business, while 30% admit to monitoring social networking sites.
  • 56% of executives said that using social networking sites helps their employees achieve better work-life balance.
  • 31% of CEO’s are on Facebook, 14% have a Twitter profile, while 18% have an employee created Facebook group.
  • 23% use social networking as part of their internal communications strategy, while 21% use it to engage their employees.

May 22, 2009

US internal comms ahead on use of social media

By James Bennett, Managing Online Editor, Melcrum James Bennett

By now I’m sure you all know what a big fan of social media I am. I can Tweet and blog until the cows come home, only virtually mind you. But I’m not alone using social media for business purposes, so it seems are US internal communicators.

Consulting firm Watson Wyatt, well know for its study on making the link between an organisation’s financial performance and communication, has discovered that despite their relative youth, US businesses are increasingly embracing Web 2.0 technologies such as social networking tools, blogs and webcasts for internal communications and as part of their overall technology mix.

The firm’s 2009 HR Technology Trends survey that questioned a total of 181 and 14,000 US employees covering more than a dozen industries, found that since the economic downturn began, 72% of employers have increased their use of the intranet and 61% have increased their use of email to communicate with employees. Employers are also using new communications tools with close to a third (32%) increasing their use of webcasts; 13% increasing their use of social networking tools; and 12% increasing their use of blogs.

Large HR and internal communications budget cutbacks were cited as the reason behind this increase in accessible and principally free social media tools. Interestingly, however, despite a rise in intranet usage, the survey discovered that the adoption of generic intranets has almost ground to a halt. While 86% of companies currently have intranets, only 2% plan to implement them in the next two years.Instead they are turning to various social media tools to plan for future HR and internal comms strategies with 13% of US respondents saying they plan to introduce and implement blogs, wikis (13%) and podcasts (10%) in the same timeframe.

“Web 2.0 technologies work well, in most instances, for targeting specific employee and manager groups, and companies are using them in appropriate situations,” said Jon Osborne, senior technology consultant at Watson Wyatt. “Using tools such as role-based portals, internal blogs and webcasts ensures that both managers and employees can send and receive tailored messages in an engaging format. This is useful for improving productivity and maintaining employee morale and engagement, particularly in this difficult economic time,” he added.

Key Findings:

  • The economy has taken a toll on HR budgets. More than 70% of participants reported a budget decrease, with an average decrease of 1%.
  • Most companies stayed true to their sourcing strategy in the past 24 months. The majority of companies that did make a move opted for more outsourcing.
  • Companies have increased their use of the intranet, e-mail and webcasts for communications during the economic crisis.
  • Satisfaction is high for those that have deployed or are piloting Web 2.0 technologies, but planning for future deployments is surprisingly low. Social networking, while extremely new, is already being used more than most other Web 2.0 tools.
  • Talent management has become a higher priority for one-third of companies due to the economic crisis.
  • More than half of companies are planning more talent management technology in the next 24 months, with an emphasis on integration. Forty-six percent will integrate their existing applications or leverage their enterprise resource planning (ERP), and 27 percent will move to an integrated suite.

What are you finding in your respective countries? Are similar increases happening in your organisations? Are you using Twitter within your employee network? Let me know either by emailing me directly at james.bennett@melcrum.com, or tweet me on Twitter by going to Twitter.com and searching for @Geskey or @Melcrum.

PS: Melcrum is holding its first (of many I'm sure) social media workshop on June 24th here at Melcrum HQ in Hammersmith, London. If you haven't already thought about using social media as part of your internal comms strategy perhaps now's the time?

May 20, 2009

Employee engagement 2.0 has arrived courtesy of Google

By James Bennett, Managing Online Editor, Melcrum James Bennett

If you thought Google employees were the most engaged in today’s cutthroat and recession-riddled corporate world, think again. Despite receiving more than 700,000 applications a year to work for the planet’s most forward thinking Web 2.0 outfit, the company has seen hiring slow, been forced to cut back on some of its infamous perks such as afternoon tea and its annual ski trip and has even seen some of its most talented Googlers jump ship to competitors such as Twitter and Facebook.

So what has it gone and done? Well being the most advanced and innovative algorithmic genius in its class it’s gone and done what it’s best at doing - created an algorithm - but this time has taken employee engagement 2.0 to an entirely new and never-before-seen level. It has produced an algorithm so advanced and so ingrained in the employment and engagement process that it can supposedly crunch employee data such as appraisals, salaries and promotion history and decipher who among its staff is the most unhappy and who among the 20,000 engineers, developers and nerds it employs is the most willing to leave. Not only does it know every move we as web users make online, it can now pry into the work-life habits of its own and work out who should stay and who should go. It’s hard to fathom but Google’s boffins know the answers before their staff do.

Currently in a test phase, the system, if proved effective – and it would have to be faultless considering the information it gathers and the consequences it could have on people’s lives – could forever change the way businesses and their internal communications departments around the world vet and engage or even dismiss their employees.

The web giant has so far, however, discovered one key trend. Those of its employees that feel underused are more likely than others to leave. But the further it looks into the problem and examines employee reviews and pay histories the more I can imagine it will uncover more detail about how its workers think, behave, and react to certain emotions and situations. The key element will be to determine whether or not this research is effective in engaging more staff, unearthing those that are unhappiest and crucially, considering the economic times we are living in, what result this has on the bottom line. Could this be the ultimate tool, the Holy Grail, that we’ve all been looking for, to finally and accurately measure how we can effectively engage our employees and return a healthy profit in order to keep share and stakeholders happy? The possibilities, as with anything this company seems to do, are endless.

Google’s engagement algorithm – why now?

  • Crunches data from employee reviews, promotion and pay histories in a mathematical formula to identify which of its 20,000 employees are most likely to leave.
  • Google officials are reluctant to share details of the formula that is still being tested.
  • Google says the algorithm has already identified employees who felt underused, a key complaint among those who contemplate leaving.
  • Current and former Googlers said the company is losing talent because some employees feel they can’t make the same impact as the company matures.
  • Google's algorithm has been described by one HR commentator as “helping the company get inside people's heads even before they know they might leave”.
  • In recent weeks several top executives has left the company including advertising sales boss Tim Armstrong and display-advertising chief David Rosenblatt, Doug Bowman, engineering director Steve Horowitz and search-quality chief Santosh Jayaram, both of which have switched sides to Facebook and Twitter.

May 18, 2009

Best job in the world campaign signs up for Oz SCM

By James Bennett, Managing Online Editor, Melcrum James Bennett

It’s what many of us strive for all our working lives, need to fulfill our ambitions, and hope to secure so that one day we can tell our children that we were there. No, not a change to dress up as a clown and compete on Deal or No Deal, I’m talking about getting the job of your dreams.

It happened to one British man last month, who from a pool of 34,000 hopeful global applicants, won the opportunity of a lifetime. Branded and marketed as ‘the best job in the world’, Ben Southall, a 34 year-old charity fundraiser from Petersfield in Hampshire, became the new caretaker of an Australian tropical island. Sound idyllic? Well it gets even better. His six-month £73,500 (AUS$110,000) contract includes a three-bedroom beach home, a swimming pool and golf cart, while his job description is to simply explore the islands of the Great Barrier Reef, swim, snorkel, make friends with the locals and generally enjoy the tropical Queensland climate and lifestyle. He will, however be expected to do some work, and in the true spirit of the Web 2.0 age we live in, will report back to Tourism Queensland (TQ) and the world via blogs, a photo diary, video updates and interviews. And this is where the business brains at TQ have come into their own.

Amid the worldwide recession tourism in Oz has fallen downhill faster than a jet propelled Koala on roller skates but this campaign has already generated massive amounts of publicity, PR and interest all around the world, and all for very little expenditure. And from an internal communications point of view it has served as a vital tool to boost employee engagement within the organisation.

More importantly, Tourism Queensland has agreed to speak about its great success story at our SCM Summit Australia on 15th to 17th September 2009 in Sydney.

In the session later in the year you’ll hear about:

  • How the campaign spawned around 200,000 blogs, 43,000 news stories and over AUS$120 million worth of publicity.
  • How the campaign was developed.
  • How social media channels were used to spark global interest.
  • How external interest was used to create engagement and enthusiasm inside the organisation.
  • How Tourism Queensland has re-energised its culture and brand.
  • How to harness successful brand initiatives to drive employee engagement.
  • How to make the most of social media tools and channels.
  • How to equip senior leaders to manage intense media interest and act as brand ambassadors.

Are you working on a groundbreaking campaign, if so we want to know? And what, in your opinion have been the best employee engagement campaigns of recent years? Let me know by either replying to this post, by emailing me at james.bennett@melcrum.com or by Twittering to @Melcrum

November 20, 2008

Lose the "command and control" attitude to help build prosperous social networks

Annie Waite

By Annie Waite, Global Editor of the Internal Comms Hub, Melcrum 

Peter Bradwell, a researcher for think tank Demos, says today’s difficult business environment tends to create an instinctive reaction from management to “batten down the hatches" and return to traditional “command and control” hierarchies - where productivity is closely monitored and measured.

But although allowing workers to have more freedom and flexibility might seem counterintuitive, "it appears to create businesses more capable of maintaining stability,” Bradwell says.

His comments, reported in a news article on the Hub this week, are drawn from the results of the Network Citizens report, commissioned by Orange (and authored by Bradwell), which developed visualizations of team networks in 6 organizations and found social networks to be at least as powerful as the formal organization, if not more so.

I spoke with David Lavenda, VP marketing & product strategy at WorkLight, a company that has helped encourage some businesses to use Facebook as a business tool. He says “It's important for communicators to provide useful tools for people to voice their concerns through a collaborative environment rather than a top-down approach."

“When deployed inside the firewall, social networking provides a secure working environment that allows employees to interact, while management concerns can be mitigated as internal discussions do not leave the confines of the organization."

But if your executive board is still in need of some persuasion about the benefits of social network, then the Network Citizens report includes some practical advice for developing responsible, prosperous networks.

  1. Do not separate social and professional networking. Attempts to control employees’ use of social networking software at work may damage the organization by depleting its network capital.
  2. Value networking with people outside the firm. Too often, only senior staff are encouraged to build external relationships. The power of horizontal networks across organization boundaries is clear and growing.
  3. Keep in touch with ex-employees. The temptation during a difficult economic climate is to hunker down, but this risks cutting off flows of network capital. Companies should consider keeping former employees in the network.
  4. Do not police networks, but consider improvements. These should be a first step towards collective conversations about the networking “rules of the game”.

Got any other tips to add? And do you agree with Lavenda that Facebook can have a positive impact at work? Have you found - or even formally measured - social networking's positive or negative effects?

September 15, 2008

Ever considered infecting your employees?

By Sona Hathi, Assistant Editor, Melcrum Sona Hathi

After much anticipation, Melcrum hosted its third members-only event in London last week. Members from all over Europe joined their peers for breakfast at London's New Connaught Rooms, to network and learn more about Melcrum's latest research into peer-to-peer communication.

The audience heard case studies from the new report Viral Communication in the Workplace, how organizations including easyJet, Pfizer, Sun Microsystems and Deloitte have "virally infected" employees with enthusiasm and interest in change programs and new initiatives.

There were presentations from 3 experts in this area of research, (who you may have heard us raving about for sometime now):

* Kieron Shaw, internal communication specialist and former head of research at Melcrum;
* Dr. Leandro Herrero, CEO of The Chalfont Project consultancy and pioneer of Viral Change™; and
* Nigel Edwards, UK communication manager, Pfizer.

The topic is one that has definitely created a buzz among internal communicators. It throws up a number of questions and concerns, as some of the ideas around viral communication and viral change are quite radical. But these companies have proved that it does work. For example, Kieron highlighted a case study from the Dutch healthcare company Novo Nordisk . The company kept secrets and withdrew information from employees, bar three small secret societies - sounds unthinkable right? "Surely that's bad for morale?" I hear you cry.

But no, it created an unimaginable amount of curiousity and interest among the workforce, in what the organization was doing. Interest that a standard corporate email, or cascade process would be hard pushed to create. It did cause irritation among some employees, but isn't negative interest better than no interest at all?

Leandro Herrero, is perhaps the most passionate guy on the topic of viral change - after all, he literally wrote the book on it. So it was fascinating to watch this Spaniard present in his signature, energetic way, on how organizational structures are changing from hierarchical to those of clusters. He says that viral change programmes cannot be led. Leaders need to remain in the background and let the message spread among the clusters in the workforce - like a virus that infects every employee.

Perhaps the quote from him that stuck out to me the most was:

"Organizations need to talk less and do more. The best culture change management program is where the words 'culture', 'change', 'management' and 'program' are silent."

Nigel Edwards, UK communication manager at Pfizer talked about how the company gave a selected number of employees video cameras to take home and make candid diary clips of their journey in the first 3 months of a major change programme. The clips were distributed to the entire workforce, resulting in the company gaining more trust from employees. I won't go in to any more detail but it's an excellent case study and you can read more on the Hub, or in the report Viral communication in the workplace.

There was a challenging Q&A session at the end of each presentation. Here's a sample:

Q: We might be most influenced by "People like us" but how credible is the information that comes from our peers?
A: No one's saying that leaders have no part to play in this. The initial corporate message still needs to come from the CEO, but employees then need to have the opportunity to discuss it, as many times as they wish, with their colleagues, talk about how they feel so that they then internalize the message. It's about giving them the platform to do this and making it very explicit that the company actually wants them to be honest and is actually interested in their opinions. Pfizer have demonstrated this very well.

Q:We've known this stuff for years, we know that employees talk and that we need to tap into what they're saying, i.e. the water-cooler conversations - so what's changed?
A: Yes this is true, but the communication tools we have access to now, make it both easier and more urgent to understand informal employee conversations, and pick out the key influencers to help spread messages about organizational changes.

Q: Our organization has a rigid corporate culture, would a viral communication method still work?
A: (Nigel Edwards) If yours is a command and control organization, then you should probably avoid something like this. Employees should be trusted to sit in the driver's seat, while leaders should be able to sit back and enjoy the ride! "There has to be will and freedom to operate if this is to be successful," says Nigel

I could go on writing about this forever, but I'll stop there. Peer-to-peer communication is a vast area of internal comms that is even more exciting now that we have excellent communication technology to encourage it. What are your thoughts?

Sona

P.S Watch out for the next Melcrum members-only event in London in Feb 2009. More events across the country are planned for the near future.

Sign up for your FREE 7Day Melcrum Membership

March 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Recent Comments