What's the future for internal communication? Key themes from Melcrum's transatlantic briefings
by Kelly Parsons, VP Research and Content,
and
Luke Dodd, Features Editor, Melcrum
Senior level internal communicators from around the world attended Melcrum’s research briefings that were held concurrently in London, UK and Washington DC, USA this week.
The briefings were held to share Melcrum's findings from its latest research study, produced for members of the Strategic Communication Research Forum (SCRF) – The Future for Internal Communication – as well as to promote lively debate and discussions on best practise.
London, UK
Simon Garcia, head of global communications, Gazprom opened the breakfast briefing, which was held at the company’s offices in central London. In attendance were senior representatives from companies including Bank of America, SABMiller, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), Deutsche Bank and Tesco.
Rebecca Richmond, director of research and content, Melcrum presided over events and showcased highlights from The Future for Internal Communication study.
All core messages of the report were covered, which included issues surrounding the post-recessional environment, the drive for productivity, the diversifying workforce and re-engineering corporate structure and management.
Good quality debate took place throughout the day with several hot topics raised.
A discussion on EVP led to the point that Generation Y may not be thinking longer term, in terms of career progression and professional development. However, it was suggested that they were, in fact, looking for a company to care about their lives and think about them as an individual, not just as an employee.
It was also argued that EVP is a two-way street: and that employee value proposition should be re-termed as employment value proposition. The interaction should work both ways and be about what the employee can do for the company, as well as what the company can do for the employee.
The pros and cons of segmentation were debated and some attendees believed there was room for a stronger focus on this area at their company. The notion of partnering more with marketing in the process of segmentation also interested the group. Line managers were also discussed, and their importance highlighted when the idea was posed that they were a “human channel” and imperative to delivering internal communication strategies.
Also, attendees raised the point that annual employee surveys were viewed as non-essential in their company, as there was simply not enough turn-around time to act upon the different points raised. Another controversial opinion shared was that internal communication was viewed as governance and monitoring when talking about social media, as opposed to a supporting function.
Washington DC, USA
Meanwhile in the US, members of Melcrum's SCRF, from companies including Citigroup, ExxonMobil and Neustar, convened for a day of learning and shared insights at Melcrum's US office in Washington DC.
Using the frame of The Future for Internal Communication study, the group discussed the key challenges communicators must overcome as they respond to a changing external environment and increasing demands from internal partners.
They touched upon the inadequacy of existing knowledge management systems in most organizations. One member mentioned her success in utilizing an alumni portal and "ask the expert" platform to connect employees to the right information at the right time.
Another major theme of the day was the difficulty members experienced "getting out in front" of technology. Attendees shared strategies for partnering more effectively through "intentional interactions" with IT to drive adoption and usage of high-potential, but under-performing, tech platforms.
The group also shared their experiences of outdated competency models; a common theme across the day. In response to this, the need for a revised competency model and associated tools will rise to the top of the Forum's agenda. Look out for this in coming weeks.
Additionally, capturing and controlling "ambient information" was considered important: members shared ideas for keeping track of what employees are saying, filtering and translating it to decision-makers and, ultimately, using informal communication channels to influence the conversation.
Until next time,
Kelly and Luke






Recent Comments